Why Is This Egg Different from All Other Eggs? |
Published by Susanna Speier under Kitchen, Sustainable Products
It’s spring and eggs—chicken’s eggs—are everywhere. Many people have the fun of boiling, cooling, and dyeing eggs for Easter; you can apply decals or even colorful stickers to them. Then there’s the big hunt—for the real thing as well as for the chocolate kind.
If you’re a Jew you can expect to see a burnt, whole, hard-boiled egg in its shell on your Seder plate. And later, you can expect to find more of them morphed into Matzo ball soup.
So whether your quest involves Passover, Easter, or just eggs for the sake of eggs, chances are you’ll end up in the refrigerated dairy section of your supermarket at some point this week. Once there, you have to make a selection among an increasingly various field of purchasing choices. And it will have to be made fast—before the kids break loose and bolt down aisle five looking for Peeps.
What kind of eggs will you buy? Jumbo versus medium? Okay, that seems simple enough. White versus brown? Easy-peasy.
But how about trying to differentiate among free range, natural, vegetarian, and organic? What, if anything, do those logos guarantee?
While you examine various cartons to inspect the labeling and attempt to decipher the hieroglyphs your kid is probably making a bee-line for the Manishevitz Macaroons.
Paul Shapiro, the Senior Director of the Humane Society of US Factory Farming Campaign, has kindly provided the following information for you. But caveat lector: let the reader beware—your eyes may glaze over on confronting language that reads more like legalese than user-friendly English. These label-deciphering suggestions do not guarantee that the farm-hens in question are being treated ethically or that their living conditions are humane. In fact, the only way to guarantee cruelty-free living conditions is to request an invitation. Ask if you can visit the farm you buy your eggs from and when you get there, trust your instincts to determine whether or not you are comfortable with what you see going on.
Egg Labels:
Certified Organic*: This means the birds may live uncaged inside barns or warehouses, and are required to have outdoor access (although issues have arisen as to lax enforcement, with some large-scale producers failing to provide birds with meaningful access to the outdoors).
They are fed an organic, all-vegetarian diet free of antibiotics and pesticides, as required by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Organic Program.
Beak cutting and forced molting through starvation are permitted. Compliance is verified through third-party auditing.
Free-Range: While the USDA has defined the meaning of “free-range” for some poultry products, there are no standards in “free-range” egg production.
Typically, free-range egg-laying hens are uncaged inside barns or warehouses and have some degree of outdoor access. They can engage in many natural behaviors such as nesting and foraging. However, there is no information available as to stocking density – how many hens are crowded into a given volume of space – or the frequency or duration of outdoor access, or the quality of the land to which the birds are given access. Neither is there information regarding what the birds may be fed.
Beak cutting and forced molting through starvation are permitted. There is no third-party auditing.
Certified Humane*: The birds are uncaged inside barns or warehouses, but legally they may be kept indoors at all times.
They must be allowed to perform natural behaviors such as nesting, perching, and dust bathing. There are requirements for stocking density and the number of perches and nesting boxes.
Forced molting through starvation is prohibited, but beak cutting is allowed.
Compliance is verified through third-party auditing. Certified Humane is a program of Humane Farm Animal Care.
Cage-Free: As the term implies, hens laying eggs labeled as “cage-free” are uncaged inside barns or warehouses, but generally do not have access to the outdoors. They have leave to engage in many of their natural behaviors such as walking, nesting, and spreading their wings.
Beak cutting and forced molting through starvation are permitted.
There is no third-party auditing.
Free-Roaming: Also known as “free-range,” this category has been defined by the USDA for some poultry products, but the authority provides no standards for “free-roaming” egg production. This essentially means the hens are cage-free.
There is no third-party auditing.
United Egg Producers Certified*: The overwhelming majority of the U.S. egg industry complies with this voluntary program, which permits factory farm practices that many people judge routine cruel and inhumane.
By 2008, hens laying these eggs were to have been afforded 67 square inches of cage space per bird, which is less area than is covered by a sheet of 8×11 paper.
The hens are confined in restrictive, barren cages and thus prohibited from performing many of their natural behaviors, such as perching, nesting, foraging or even spreading their wings.
Forced molting through starvation is prohibited, but beak cutting is allowed.
Compliance is verified through third-party auditing. This is a program of the United Egg Producers.
Vegetarian-Fed: These birds’ feed may not contain animal byproducts (unlike that consumed by most laying hens), but this label has no bearing on the animals’ living conditions.
Natural: This label has no relevance to animal welfare.
Fertile: These eggs were laid by hens that lived with roosters, meaning they most likely were not caged.
Omega-3 Enriched: This label claim has no relevance to animal welfare.
* Labels that abide by official, audited guidelines. Please note that even these terms permit a wide variance in animal welfare practices.
If you’re still mulling over these mind-numbing differences at the supermarket, chances are you’ve lost your kids by now, or else they’re at your shopping-cart, egging you on to buy them chocolate bunnies. Happy holidays! Breathe.
“The best way to guarantee that the chickens are being treated ethically,” Shapiro says, is to “visit the farms they are raised on.” Unfortunately, that is not a realistic option for the vast majority of us.
But anyone interested in deciphering those cryptic supermarket egg cartons may visit the Human Society’s website for assistance. Another way to lobby for positive change is to sign the Humane Society petition urging our government to impose stronger regulations on poultry farms’ treatment of their charges.
With Passover beginning at sundown tonight, I am reminded of the four questions traditionally asked at the ritual Seder meal among whose fare is always included a burnt, whole, hard-boiled egg in its shell.
First: Why is this night different from all other nights?
Egg-lovers the world around can now ask this variation: Why is this egg different from all other eggs?
Susanna Speier writes for Earth911, The eCo Times and maintains a sustainability column for Examiner.com. She is also a screenwriter and a playwright. Memberships include The Dramatists Guild, Women in Film and The Hollywood Hill. Additional information about her work –including publication archives, production archives and plethoras of links– are available on her website
2 Responses to “Why Is This Egg Different from All Other Eggs?”
Leave a Reply
Find Us
Blog Sponsors
Featured Designers
-
A Lot To Say
AirDye
Alabama Chanin
Beyond Skin
Bibico
Bird Textiles – Luxury Eco Textile Design
Bobelle
C. Marchuska
CLOTH
Desira Pesta
Doucette Duvall
Eco-Citizen
Ecoist
EcoLogiQue
ecoSkin
Escama Studio
Feral Childe
Greenbees
Jackston, Johnson, & Roe
Jen Darling
Kill Spencer
Komodo
Mountains of the Moon
Nau
Novacas
Olsenhaus
Pia Stanchina
Popomomo
Prairie Underground
Rani Jones
Remade USA
Stay Vocal
SUST
Te Casan by Natalie Portman
Terra Plana
The Wren
The Wren
TRAIDremade
Vagadu
Zachary's Smile
Sustainable Fashion
-
Bibico
Clary Sage Organics
Commerce With A Conscience
Eco Fashion World
EcoStiletto
Ecouterre
Ethical Fashion Forum
Ethical Style
Fashion, Evolved
FeelGoodStyle
Green Grechen
Green LA Girl
On Our Sleeve
Project Green Search
Style Saves The World
Style Will Save Us
Sustain Your Style
The Green Loop
Thereafterish
Threadbanger
Fashion/Style Blogs
-
Cotorture
denim on denim
Full Frontal Fashion
Good Girls Cook and Wear Makeup
Green Cotton
Green Vogue SOS
Hello Beauty Blog
Ip & Audrey
NOTCOUTURE
Paper Doll
Smart.Sustainable.Style.
The Beauty Bohemian
The Thrifty Chicks
WIT and Whimsy
Sustainable Shopping
-
Beklina
Conifer SF
Conifer SF
Green Eyed
Jute & Jackfruit
Kaight
Kind Boutique
Lizard Lounge
Mayu
My Green Lipstick
The Green Loop
Sustainable Design
Green Living
-
Alternative Consumer
Cinnaholic
EarthSense
Easy Eco To Go
Eco Creative
Fig + Sage
Forced Green
Glamology
Going Green Limousine
Lacretia Hardy, Health Coach
Modern Hippie Mag
Social Alterations
Sun People Dry Goods
The Chic Ecologist
The Daily Green
The Snappy Dragon
To Be The Change
Traveling Greener
Green By Design on Twitter
Recent Comments






Susanna, your article brings up the subject of Proposition 2, an initiative on the November 2008 ballot in California. The initiative, called Standards for Confining Farm Animals, was the first time that US citizens voted to eliminate the practice of confining chickens in battery cages. They’re are so confining that chickens can’t turn around freely, lie down, stand up, or extend their limbs fully.
I voted for Prop 2 and was glad to see it pass with over 63% of the vote. Unfortunately, the key portion of the statute will not go into effect until January 2015.
Prop 2 not only bans dense confinement for egg-laying poultry, but also gestation crates for sows and veal crates for veal calves. It imposes a misdemeanor penalty and a fine of up $1,000 or six months in prison for violators.
This is definitely a hot issue on a national scale, as Oprah dedicated an hour-long Oprah show about Prop 2 before the election. Interestingly, the New York Times came out in favor of Prop 2, although the San Francisco Chronicle and the Los Angeles Times did not.
Timely! Just after writing the comment above, I read today’s op-ed column by Nicholas Kristof in the New York Times: Humanity Even for Nonhumans.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/opinion/09kristof.html?ref=opinion
Kristof begins the piece with the ballot initiative and goes on to talk about Princeton scholar Peter Singer, who has been addressing the issue of animal rights for decades.
Kristof ends the piece by writing: ‘Yet however we may answer these questions, there is one profound difference from past centuries: animal rights are now firmly on the mainstream ethical agenda.’