Energy at the Bottom Line |
Published by Green by Design under Green Living
Money rules our glance. Be it food, cars, or utility bills–unless physical or financial belt-tightening prompts us to look deeper, we often don’t examine our consumption in terms of the underlying calories we take in, the mpg we roll up, or the kilowatt-hours we burn (kilowatt-hours: kWh–for a definition, see bottom of page).
As a consequence, very few of us pay much attention to how much electricity we use. We heed the bottom line: the number next to PAY THIS AMOUNT on our bills. (Heaven forbid, you should pay automatically through your checking account and never even notice the amount being withdrawn every month! We’ll talk to you later.)
Unless your monthly electric bill is way out of bounds, you sign the check or click to pay, and move on. For the average US household, that’s about $100 per month for 936 kWh of power, according to statistics from the US Department of Energy (2007).
But the average bill doesn’t tell much of a story.
The plot thickens when you consider how much electricity usage varies from state to state–from a low of 530 kWh in Maine (maybe because of all the Swamp Yankees up there?) to a high of 1,344 kWh in Tennessee (does the Tennessee Valley Authority give the stuff away?).
Where is your state in these US Department of Energy statistics? Are your state-mates energy hogs or conservers?
Average Household Monthly Consumption by State
|
|
Average Monthly |
Average Retail Price |
|
State |
Consumption (kWh) |
(¢ per kWh) |
| Maine |
530 |
16.52 |
| California |
580 |
14.42 |
| Vermont |
592 |
14.15 |
| New York |
604 |
17.10 |
| Rhode Island |
608 |
14.05 |
| New Hampshire |
632 |
14.88 |
| Massachusetts |
635 |
16.23 |
| New Mexico |
640 |
9.12 |
| Hawaii (highest cost) |
655 |
24.12 |
| Alaska |
664 |
15.18 |
| Michigan |
686 |
10.21 |
| Colorado |
710 |
9.25 |
| Wisconsin |
725 |
10.87 |
| New Jersey |
730 |
14.14 |
| Connecticut (2nd highest cost) |
764 |
19.11 |
| Washington, DC |
773 |
11.18 |
| Illinois |
790 |
10.12 |
| Utah |
802 |
8.15 |
| Montana |
824 |
8.77 |
| Minnesota |
832 |
9.18 |
| Wyoming |
871 |
7.75 |
| Pennsylvania |
874 |
10.95 |
| Iowa |
886 |
9.45 |
| Kansas |
920 |
8.19 |
| Ohio |
926 |
9.57 |
| US Average |
936 |
10.65 |
| Delaware |
960 |
13.16 |
| Nevada |
986 |
11.82 |
| South Dakota |
991 |
8.07 |
| Oregon |
1,009 |
8.19 |
| Nebraska |
1,028 |
7.59 |
| Indiana |
1,058 |
8.26 |
| Washington |
1,073 |
7.26 |
| Idaho (lowest cost) |
1,078 |
6.36 |
| North Dakota |
1,078 |
7.30 |
| Maryland |
1,086 |
11.89 |
| Oklahoma |
1,100 |
8.58 |
| Arkansas |
1,118 |
8.73 |
| Missouri |
1,121 |
7.69 |
| Texas |
1,136 |
12.34 |
| West Virginia (2nd lowest cost) |
1,138 |
6.73 |
| Arizona |
1,142 |
9.66 |
| North Carolina |
1,143 |
9.40 |
| Florida |
1,163 |
11.22 |
| Georgia |
1,171 |
9.10 |
| Virginia |
1,207 |
8.74 |
| South Carolina |
1,210 |
9.19 |
| Kentucky |
1,217 |
7.34 |
| Mississippi |
1,261 |
9.36 |
| Louisiana |
1,276 |
9.37 |
| Alabama |
1,305 |
9.32 |
| Tennessee |
1,344 |
7.84 |
Source: US Department of Energy, 2007
One of the obvious questions these numbers bring up is: why do we see a 250 per cent difference in usage between Tennessee and Maine?
It appears many factors drive consumption, including energy costs, public policy, construction standards, energy system standards, weather, and cultural differences.
Focusing on only the first of these, we see that the cost of electricity, in cents per kWh, varies even more than usage, by 300 per cent. Idaho has the lowest-cost electricity at 6.36¢ per kWh, and Connecticut–on the mainland–leads the pack at 19.11¢. And, as you’d expect, there’s a strong correlation between cost and usage: states that consume more generally have lower energy costs, as shown here:

Source: US Department of Energy, 2007
Hey, I’ll take as much electricity as you’ll give me for $100.
Of course, if you don’t care about your carbon footprint, these stats may not even concern you, as grid power is inexpensive today compared to renewable alternatives. But once you consider switching to a solar array to energize your home, your kWh usage is a critical guide to the cost of equipment needed on your roof.
In his article Weaning Off the Grid, Hubert Den Draak points out that he set a target of 90-150 kWh per month for his solar and wind-powered home, an amount that is only 20-30% of the average usage in Maine, the most energy-efficient state. How easy was it for Hubert to bring the consumption down that low? It required more than replacing a few light bulbs. It involved keeping his house a bit warmer in the summer (little or no AC) and a bit cooler in the winter (67F/19C). It meant installing double-pane windows, plus adding heaps more insulation where he could, and reducing phantom loads.
That said, we can all take the first step to getting what we ultimately want from energy–low cost, environmental health, independence–by simply building awareness and watching usage. Even though money rules our glance, take a second look at the kWh number on your next bill. Make it part of the bill-paying process. Bring it up at the dinner table.
Just watch it at first. Later, set a goal. Pretty soon both money and kWh will rule your glance. After all, kWh is money.
| What is a kWh? Don’t panic. We’re not going to get into joules, dynes, or amperes. Just one important measure of energy that appears on your electric bill–the kilowatt-hour, abbreviated as kWh. - A kWh is the product of two terms: power in kilowatts multiplied by time in hours. A kilowatt is 1,000 watts, which is the amount of power drawn by ten 100-watt light bulbs, for example. - If all ten light bulbs were turned on for two hours, you’d be using 2 kWh of electricity (10 light bulbs x 100 watts per bulb ÷ 1,000 watts per kilowatt x 2 hours = 2 kWh). - You’ll also see kWh formatted as kW h or kW•h, forms which are recommended by the standards organizations IEEE, ASTM, and NIST, because they more accurately represent the measure as the product of power and time. The incorrect term to avoid is kW/h. |
Source: Wikipedia.com
7 Responses to “Energy at the Bottom Line”
Leave a Reply
Find Us
Blog Sponsors
Featured Designers
-
A Lot To Say
AirDye
Alabama Chanin
Beyond Skin
Bibico
Bird Textiles – Luxury Eco Textile Design
Bobelle
C. Marchuska
CLOTH
Desira Pesta
Doucette Duvall
Eco-Citizen
Ecoist
EcoLogiQue
ecoSkin
Escama Studio
Feral Childe
Greenbees
Jackston, Johnson, & Roe
Jen Darling
Kill Spencer
Komodo
Mountains of the Moon
Nau
Novacas
Olsenhaus
Pia Stanchina
Popomomo
Prairie Underground
Rani Jones
Remade USA
Stay Vocal
SUST
Te Casan by Natalie Portman
Terra Plana
The Wren
The Wren
TRAIDremade
Vagadu
Zachary's Smile
Sustainable Fashion
-
Bibico
Clary Sage Organics
Commerce With A Conscience
Eco Fashion World
EcoStiletto
Ecouterre
Ethical Fashion Forum
Ethical Style
Fashion, Evolved
FeelGoodStyle
Green Grechen
Green LA Girl
On Our Sleeve
Project Green Search
Style Saves The World
Style Will Save Us
Sustain Your Style
The Green Loop
Thereafterish
Threadbanger
Fashion/Style Blogs
-
Cotorture
denim on denim
Full Frontal Fashion
Good Girls Cook and Wear Makeup
Green Cotton
Green Vogue SOS
Hello Beauty Blog
Ip & Audrey
NOTCOUTURE
Paper Doll
Smart.Sustainable.Style.
The Beauty Bohemian
The Thrifty Chicks
WIT and Whimsy
Sustainable Shopping
-
Beklina
Conifer SF
Conifer SF
Green Eyed
Jute & Jackfruit
Kaight
Kind Boutique
Lizard Lounge
Mayu
My Green Lipstick
The Green Loop
Sustainable Design
Green Living
-
Alternative Consumer
Cinnaholic
EarthSense
Easy Eco To Go
Eco Creative
Fig + Sage
Forced Green
Glamology
Going Green Limousine
Lacretia Hardy, Health Coach
Modern Hippie Mag
Social Alterations
Sun People Dry Goods
The Chic Ecologist
The Daily Green
The Snappy Dragon
To Be The Change
Traveling Greener
Green By Design on Twitter
Recent Comments






That average consumption by state chart is unreal. A lot of the states on the low end I would have put much higher.
Great article, thanks!
there is a piece of this chart that never gets discussed…
where the electricity is cheap more homes are completely heated by electricity. I live in the NW and many of the homes are heated exclusively with electricity (radiant, resistance, heat pump, etc), no fossil fuels are used at all!
these discussions should always include all energy sources used in the house
Strange that Maine is listed twice with two different sets of values…either way- it’s pricey per kWh given the state’s per capita income levels.
Hey Sam,
Great post. Though I’d love to tell you that we Mainers are a frugal, conserving bunch, the story behind the story is that 80% of our homes rely on heating oil for winter heat, and not electricity. All in, including transportation, Maine’s mix is only 10% electric.
Amongst the long term thinkers in Maine, there’s a lively and very interesting discussion going on about the future transition when we bring on offshore wind. The Gulf of Maine has been called the “Saudi Arabia of Wind” and if we can pull it off, Maine could be awash in low cost electricity–a form of energy, at the moment, we’re not equipped to make much use of.
Best, PT
(disclosure: I’m founder/CEO of EnergyCircle.com)
Cool article. and good point chris… here in Vermont, we use both Hydropower from Canada (yea) and Nuclear from Vermont Yankee (boo). As with most homes in the N.E., we heat with oil, not electricity. Interesting side note, most of that oil is sold to our local suppliers from Morgan Stanley (dam futures traders…)
Abbie,
Thanks for finding the typo in the table above. We corrected the second instance of Maine, replacing it with Massachusetts.
Glad you’re on top of things. Wouldn’t want to leave out the state where I lived for nearly 20 years!
-Martha
If we are using grid power… this may be our share of fossil-fuel use.
The share of electricity generation in the US is approx:
Fossil-fuel 71% (Coal is majority at 48%)
Nuclear 20%
Hydro Dams 6%
Other 3%
The highest usage states fall under the Tennessee Valley Authority’s power grid. They have a large hydro dam system, but I’m still surprised how high the fossil-fuel percentage is.
“Fossil-fuel plants produce about 60 percent of TVA’s power, nuclear plants about 30 percent, and hydropower dams about 10 percent. Green power also contributes to the generation mix.”