Energy at the Bottom Line

Published by Green by Design under Green Living



Electricity ConsumptionMoney rules our glance. Be it food, cars, or utility bills–unless physical or financial belt-tightening prompts us to look deeper, we often don’t examine our consumption in terms of the underlying calories we take in, the mpg we roll up, or the kilowatt-hours we burn (kilowatt-hours: kWh–for a definition, see bottom of page).

As a consequence, very few of us pay much attention to how much electricity we use. We heed the bottom line: the number next to PAY THIS AMOUNT on our bills. (Heaven forbid, you should pay automatically through your checking account and never even notice the amount being withdrawn every month! We’ll talk to you later.)

Unless your monthly electric bill is way out of bounds, you sign the check or click to pay, and move on. For the average US household, that’s about $100 per month for 936 kWh of power, according to statistics from the US Department of Energy (2007).

But the average bill doesn’t tell much of a story.

The plot thickens when you consider how much electricity usage varies from state to state–from a low of 530 kWh in Maine (maybe because of all the Swamp Yankees up there?) to a high of 1,344 kWh in Tennessee (does the Tennessee Valley Authority give the stuff away?).

Where is your state in these US Department of Energy statistics? Are your state-mates energy hogs or conservers?

Average Household Monthly Consumption by State

Average Monthly

Average Retail Price

State

Consumption (kWh)

(¢ per kWh)

Maine

530

16.52

California

580

14.42

Vermont

592

14.15

New York

604

17.10

Rhode Island

608

14.05

New Hampshire

632

14.88

Massachusetts

635

16.23

New Mexico

640

9.12

Hawaii (highest cost)

655

24.12

Alaska

664

15.18

Michigan

686

10.21

Colorado

710

9.25

Wisconsin

725

10.87

New Jersey

730

14.14

Connecticut (2nd highest cost)

764

19.11

Washington, DC

773

11.18

Illinois

790

10.12

Utah

802

8.15

Montana

824

8.77

Minnesota

832

9.18

Wyoming

871

7.75

Pennsylvania

874

10.95

Iowa

886

9.45

Kansas

920

8.19

Ohio

926

9.57

US Average

936

10.65

Delaware

960

13.16

Nevada

986

11.82

South Dakota

991

8.07

Oregon

1,009

8.19

Nebraska

1,028

7.59

Indiana

1,058

8.26

Washington

1,073

7.26

Idaho (lowest cost)

1,078

6.36

North Dakota

1,078

7.30

Maryland

1,086

11.89

Oklahoma

1,100

8.58

Arkansas

1,118

8.73

Missouri

1,121

7.69

Texas

1,136

12.34

West Virginia (2nd lowest cost)

1,138

6.73

Arizona

1,142

9.66

North Carolina

1,143

9.40

Florida

1,163

11.22

Georgia

1,171

9.10

Virginia

1,207

8.74

South Carolina

1,210

9.19

Kentucky

1,217

7.34

Mississippi

1,261

9.36

Louisiana

1,276

9.37

Alabama

1,305

9.32

Tennessee

1,344

7.84

Source: US Department of Energy, 2007

One of the obvious questions these numbers bring up is: why do we see a 250 per cent difference in usage between Tennessee and Maine?

It appears many factors drive consumption, including energy costs, public policy, construction standards, energy system standards, weather, and cultural differences.

Focusing on only the first of these, we see that the cost of electricity, in cents per kWh, varies even more than usage, by 300 per cent. Idaho has the lowest-cost electricity at 6.36¢ per kWh, and Connecticut–on the mainland–leads the pack at 19.11¢. And, as you’d expect, there’s a strong correlation between cost and usage: states that consume more generally have lower energy costs, as shown here:

Household energy consumption
Source: US Department of Energy, 2007

Hey, I’ll take as much electricity as you’ll give me for $100.

Of course, if you don’t care about your carbon footprint, these stats may not even concern you, as grid power is inexpensive today compared to renewable alternatives. But once you consider switching to a solar array to energize your home, your kWh usage is a critical guide to the cost of equipment needed on your roof.

In his article Weaning Off the Grid, Hubert Den Draak points out that he set a target of 90-150 kWh per month for his solar and wind-powered home, an amount that is only 20-30% of the average usage in Maine, the most energy-efficient state. How easy was it for Hubert to bring the consumption down that low? It required more than replacing a few light bulbs. It involved keeping his house a bit warmer in the summer (little or no AC) and a bit cooler in the winter (67F/19C). It meant installing double-pane windows, plus adding heaps more insulation where he could, and reducing phantom loads.

That said, we can all take the first step to getting what we ultimately want from energy–low cost, environmental health, independence–by simply building awareness and watching usage. Even though money rules our glance, take a second look at the kWh number on your next bill. Make it part of the bill-paying process. Bring it up at the dinner table.

Just watch it at first. Later, set a goal. Pretty soon both money and kWh will rule your glance. After all, kWh is money.

What is a kWh?
Don’t panic. We’re not going to get into joules, dynes, or amperes. Just one important measure of energy that appears on your electric bill–the kilowatt-hour, abbreviated as kWh.
-
A kWh is the product of two terms: power in kilowatts multiplied by time in hours. A kilowatt is 1,000 watts, which is the amount of power drawn by ten 100-watt light bulbs, for example.
-
If all ten light bulbs were turned on for two hours, you’d be using 2 kWh of electricity (10 light bulbs x 100 watts per bulb ÷ 1,000 watts per kilowatt x 2 hours = 2 kWh).
-
You’ll also see kWh formatted as kW h or kW•h, forms which are recommended by the standards organizations IEEE, ASTM, and NIST, because they more accurately represent the measure as the product of power and time. The incorrect term to avoid is kW/h.

Source: Wikipedia.com



7 Responses to “Energy at the Bottom Line”

  1. That average consumption by state chart is unreal. A lot of the states on the low end I would have put much higher.

    Great article, thanks!

  2. chris says:

    there is a piece of this chart that never gets discussed…

    where the electricity is cheap more homes are completely heated by electricity. I live in the NW and many of the homes are heated exclusively with electricity (radiant, resistance, heat pump, etc), no fossil fuels are used at all!

    these discussions should always include all energy sources used in the house

  3. Abbie says:

    Strange that Maine is listed twice with two different sets of values…either way- it’s pricey per kWh given the state’s per capita income levels.

  4. Peter Troast says:

    Hey Sam,

    Great post. Though I’d love to tell you that we Mainers are a frugal, conserving bunch, the story behind the story is that 80% of our homes rely on heating oil for winter heat, and not electricity. All in, including transportation, Maine’s mix is only 10% electric.

    Amongst the long term thinkers in Maine, there’s a lively and very interesting discussion going on about the future transition when we bring on offshore wind. The Gulf of Maine has been called the “Saudi Arabia of Wind” and if we can pull it off, Maine could be awash in low cost electricity–a form of energy, at the moment, we’re not equipped to make much use of.

    Best, PT
    (disclosure: I’m founder/CEO of EnergyCircle.com)

  5. Dave says:

    Cool article. and good point chris… here in Vermont, we use both Hydropower from Canada (yea) and Nuclear from Vermont Yankee (boo). As with most homes in the N.E., we heat with oil, not electricity. Interesting side note, most of that oil is sold to our local suppliers from Morgan Stanley (dam futures traders…)

  6. Martha says:

    Abbie,
    Thanks for finding the typo in the table above. We corrected the second instance of Maine, replacing it with Massachusetts.

    Glad you’re on top of things. Wouldn’t want to leave out the state where I lived for nearly 20 years!
    -Martha

  7. Sam Leppanen says:

    If we are using grid power… this may be our share of fossil-fuel use.

    The share of electricity generation in the US is approx:
    Fossil-fuel 71% (Coal is majority at 48%)
    Nuclear 20%
    Hydro Dams 6%
    Other 3%

    The highest usage states fall under the Tennessee Valley Authority’s power grid. They have a large hydro dam system, but I’m still surprised how high the fossil-fuel percentage is.

    “Fossil-fuel plants produce about 60 percent of TVA’s power, nuclear plants about 30 percent, and hydropower dams about 10 percent. Green power also contributes to the generation mix.”

Leave a Reply

(will not be shown)

Find Us

  • Add to Google





  • click to join!

Blog Sponsors

Featured Designers

Sustainable Fashion

Fashion/Style Blogs

Sustainable Shopping

Sustainable Design

Green Living

    Green By Design on Twitter

Recent Comments

  • Mary: Well written. So easy to understand! Thanks!
  • Celestyna Brozek: Maybe you could mount it somehow as artwork – there are shadowbox frames that let you display...
  • teapot: Any ideas about saving fabric that’s beginning to fall apart? Or swatches which have sentimental value?...
  • Gena: I’ve installed Rinnai R85 tree years ago in Montreal. I love it – endless supply of hot water. All...
  • sherry: i think quartz stone is high green,not like your words”low”. Materials from nature and are mixed...
  • Archives